
Public goods and monopolies are both vital concepts and have an important relationship inside the environmental economics' landscape. Consumers can actually benefit from monopolies, economically speaking, and in the long run, monopolies help keep our ecology more pristine by not allowing more than one firm in a specific market to perform environmentally sensitive construction within an environmentally sensitive area. There is no debate that many times public goods can be supplied by monopolies more efficiently than in competitive markets.
Monopolies are managed and mitigated, many times, to actually benefit society. For instance, natural monopolies can actually perform better in a specific market rather than having two or more competitive firms trying to meet consumer demands. Economists have shown that allowing a single business entity to control the operations of specific utilities takes away the wastefulness of duplicating costly infrastructure improvements and other capital investments. Obviously, most competitive markets help keep costs down for consumers and increase innovation for industries, but this is not always the case for those that supply utility services. For instance, it may not be worthwhile to have two competing companies constructing gas lines or electrical lines within the same market. Companies that duplicate capital ventures that require digging and placing gas lines and then make these companies buy easements from governmental agencies/private citizens simply for placing power poles is often cost ineffective in terms of keeping prices low within a market. The end result would be higher energy prices for consumers in that local market.
Think about it, The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and other transportation agencies across America delineate environmental wetlands before any roadway is to be rehabilitated or newly constructed. The Right of Way limits for these roadways harbor utilities like underground gas lines, sewage, telephone, and overhead electrical lines. Power poles for these electrical lines must be located far enough away from the edge of the travel lanes to ensure vehicles can navigate roads safely. Due to an environmental wetland being too close to a roadway, FDOT may deem it necessary for only a single market supplier to be established within its Right of Way. This means that transportation agencies like FDOT are actually promoting natural monopolies. Therefore, all of this illustrates how government and governmental agencies can manage how and when monopolies are to occur. Besides these natural monopolies, other forms of monopoly, the harmful monopolies, are regulated by our Antitrust laws to ensure that unfair business practices of price setting does not arise.
News in Local and World Environmental Economics.
Article Source:http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Billy_J_Best
Did you find this article helpful?00












News and Society: Economics
Billy J Best


Best, Billy J.".".13 Dec. 2011EzineArticles.com.26 Jan. 2012
Best, B. J. (2011, December 13). . Retrieved January 26, 2012, from http://ezinearticles.com/?Monopolies-Are-the-Environments-Best-Friend&id=6755278Chicago Style Citation:
Best, Billy J. "." EzineArticles.com. http://ezinearticles.com/?Monopolies-Are-the-Environments-Best-Friend&id=6755278

All Rights Reserved WorldwideAbout UsFAQContact UsMember BenefitsPrivacy PolicyShopSite MapBlogTrainingVideo ArchiveAdvertisingAffiliatesCartoonsAuthorsSubmit ArticlesMembers LoginPremium MembershipExpert AuthorsEndorsementsEditorial GuidelinesTerms of ServicePublishersFollow UsTerms Of ServiceEzines / Email AlertsManage SubscriptionsEzineArticles RSS




View the Original article
No comments:
Post a Comment